![]() Synchronized transcripts are interesting because they allow someone to both follow the audio and the text at the same time. Cons: Complex implementation, possible expensive.It splits their attention between the transcript and the show’s page.ĭownloadable documents are also rarely fully accessible, particularly if you are providing PDF files.Īn example of a linked transcript for The Big Web Show: Synchronized While it is easier for you, it is more difficult to get to the transcript for your audience. If you are receiving a document from a transcription service, it is easy to simply upload that document and provide a link to it. ![]() Cons: Harder to access for podcast followers, no SEO advantage, often poorly accessible.This will ultimately increase your reach.Īn example of inline transcripts for the A11y Rules Podcast: Īnother example of inline transcript for The Podcast Host: Downloadable file or linked transcript The information is right there for everyone to see and skim if they are looking for specific information.Īs it is part of your podcast’s episode page, it is also available to search engines. This is, by far, the best way to provide a transcript. Cons: May detract from the look, may not be implementable on your podcast platform.Pros: Content available immediately, increases SEO.This allows people who access your podcast through apps rather than your site to know transcripts are available. If you provide transcripts, always say so in the intro of your podcast episode. The best way is directly in the page, right after your show notes, in plain text or HTML. There are a few ways to display transcripts. Always do a test run of 1 episode before committing to multiple episodes. If you need transcripts for languages other than English, the rates increase very quickly.īuyer beware. They charge US$1/minute and are generally quite accurate. The best balance I’ve found has been from Rev 2. I’ve seen rates as high as US$5 per minute of sound file. While quite accurate, they are rarely 100% accurate. Human transcription services are the most expensive way to go. Cons: Potentially expensive, potentially long turnaround.They currently charge US$0.10 per minute of sound file. I have used Temi with some success in the past 1. This can be a good balance between cost, speed, and accuracy. You can use automated transcription services and then manually correct the errors. Some would say: “ Better a transcript accurate to 80% than no transcript at all”. They can be a good option if you want to provide transcript but you are strapped for cash. I tested several of these services and I personally chose not to use them. However, the accuracy is generally not good. It takes a matter of minutes to get transcripts for hour-long show. More and more services use speech-to-text engines to create transcripts. Beware! Some of these applications are using speech-to-text engines rather than allowing you to do manual transcription. Do a search for “transcription software” and you’ll have many options. It also often comes down to personal preference. I won’t recommend any in particular here as these things change fast. There is software available, often for free or at low cost, that allows you to run the sound file and pause it as you type. However, it was quite time consuming, particularly as I wasn’t familiar with making transcripts. And I knew exactly when I was getting the transcript back. ![]() The transcripts were, out of the box, the most accurate transcripts I ever got - Obviously I understood what I said and knew the topic we were talking about. When I started my podcast, I was doing my own transcription.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |